Basics of Contracts and Agreements in India

Posted on June 12, 2024

Understanding Contracts and Agreements in India

Contracts and agreements form the backbone of commercial and personal transactions in India. Let’s delve into the intricacies of contract law, exploring its fundamental principles, formation, essentials, and related concepts.

Table of Contents

Basics of Contracts and Agreements

A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties, enforceable by law. It typically involves an offer by one party, acceptance by the other party, consideration exchanged between them, and an intention to create legal relations. Contracts can be written, oral, or implied by the conduct of the parties.

Formation of Contracts

Offer and Acceptance: An offer is a proposal made by one party to another, expressing a willingness to enter into a contract on certain terms. Acceptance occurs when the offeree agrees to the terms of the offer, creating a binding contract. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 2(h), Section 7-9).
Consideration: Every contract must be supported by consideration, which is something of value exchanged between the parties. Consideration may consist of money, goods, services, or even refraining from doing something. It ensures that the parties have bargained for the contract. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 2(d), Section 25).
Intention to Create Legal Relations: For a contract to be valid, the parties must intend to create legal relations. While social agreements and agreements between family members may lack this intention, commercial agreements are presumed to have it.

Essentials of Contracts

Competent Parties: The parties to a contract must be competent to contract. This means they must be of the age of majority, of sound mind, and not disqualified by law from entering into contracts. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 11).
Lawful Object: The object of the contract must be lawful. A contract with an unlawful object or consideration is void. It must not be prohibited by law, immoral, or against public policy. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 23).
Certainty and Possibility of Performance: The terms of the contract must be certain and capable of performance. Vague or ambiguous terms may render the contract void for uncertainty. Additionally, the performance of the contract must be possible and not impossible or unlawful. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 29).

Invitation to Offer

An invitation to offer is a preliminary communication inviting others to make an offer. It is not an offer itself but an invitation to negotiate. Common examples include advertisements, price lists, and auction catalogs. The distinction between an offer and an invitation to offer is crucial in determining contractual intent.

Free Consent

Free consent is essential for the validity of a contract. It means that the consent of the parties must be given freely, without any coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake. Consent obtained through such vitiating factors renders the contract voidable at the option of the aggrieved party. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 13-22).

Ingredients of Free Consent

Absence of Coercion (Section 15): Coercion refers to the act of compelling someone to enter into a contract through the use of force or threats. For consent to be free, it must be given without any coercion. If a party’s consent is obtained under duress or threat of harm, the contract is voidable at the option of the coerced party.
Absence of Undue Influence (Section 16): Undue influence occurs when one party takes advantage of a position of trust or confidence to manipulate the decision-making of the other party. It involves the exercise of undue pressure or persuasion to induce the weaker party to enter into the contract. Consent obtained under undue influence is not considered free and renders the contract voidable.
Absence of Fraud (Section 17): Fraud involves deliberate deception or misrepresentation by one party with the intent to induce the other party to enter into the contract. The misrepresentation could be regarding a material fact, or there may be active concealment of facts. If consent is obtained through fraud, the contract is voidable at the option of the party deceived.
Absence of Misrepresentation (Section 18): Misrepresentation occurs when one party makes a false statement of fact to the other party, leading them to enter into the contract under a mistaken belief. Misrepresentation may be innocent, negligent, or fraudulent. If consent is obtained through misrepresentation, the contract is voidable by the innocent party.
Absence of Mistake (Section 20): Mistake refers to an erroneous belief held by one or both parties regarding a fundamental aspect of the contract. Mistakes may be unilateral (one party is mistaken) or mutual (both parties are mistaken). If consent is given based on a mistake of fact essential to the contract, the contract may be voidable.

Few Reference Case Laws

Bhagwandas Goverdhandas Kedia v. M/s. Girdharilal Parshottamdas & Co. (1966): This case established the principle of invitation to offer, distinguishing between an offer and an invitation to offer.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Motorola India Pvt. Ltd. (2009): This case addressed the concept of free consent and the consequences of its absence, emphasizing the importance of genuine consent in contractual agreements.

Rule of Frustration of Contracts

The rule of frustration applies when an unforeseen event occurs, rendering the performance of the contract impossible, illegal, or radically different from what was contemplated by the parties. In such cases, the contract becomes void. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 56).

Indemnity

Indemnity is a contractual agreement by which one party agrees to compensate the other for any loss, damage, or liability incurred. It serves as a safeguard against potential risks or liabilities arising from specified events. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 124).

Specific Performance

Specific performance is a discretionary remedy available at the discretion of the court, whereby the court orders the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations. It is typically granted in cases involving unique goods or services where monetary compensation would not suffice to remedy the breach. (Indian Contract Act, 1872, Section 10).

Rescission and Novation

Rescission: Rescission refers to the cancellation or termination of a contract by mutual agreement or due to a material breach by one party. It restores the parties to their pre-contractual positions.
Novation: Novation occurs when the original contract is substituted with a new contract with the consent of all parties. It effectively replaces the old contract with a new one, extinguishing the obligations under the original contract.

Reciprocal Obligations

Reciprocal obligations are obligations that arise from the same contract and are dependent on each other. Each party’s obligation serves as consideration for the other party’s promise. Breach of reciprocal obligations can lead to legal consequences, including remedies such as damages or specific performance.

Additional Concepts

Implied Contracts: Implied contracts are formed based on the conduct of the parties rather than explicit agreements. They arise when parties act in a manner that implies mutual consent and understanding, giving rise to contractual obligations.
Void and Voidable Contracts: A void contract is one that lacks essential elements from its inception and is unenforceable by law. A voidable contract, on the other hand, is initially valid but may be rescinded by one of the parties due to vitiating factors such as fraud, coercion, or undue influence.
Unilateral Contracts: In a unilateral contract, one party makes a promise in exchange for the performance of an act by the other party. The contract is formed upon completion of the act specified in the offer.
Quasi-Contracts: Quasi-contracts are not true contracts but legal obligations imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment. They arise in situations where one party benefits at the expense of another without a valid contract.

Conclusion

Contracts and agreements form the cornerstone of legal relationships in India, governing various transactions and interactions between parties. Understanding the fundamental principles, formation requirements, and key concepts of contract law is essential for individuals and businesses to navigate their contractual obligations effectively. By adhering to the principles of offer and acceptance, ensuring free consent, and upholding the essentials of valid contracts, parties can enter into agreements confidently, secure in the knowledge that their rights and obligations are legally protected.

Should you require further clarification on any aspect of contract law or seek legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances, consulting a qualified legal professional is advisable. With a sound understanding of contract law principles, individuals and businesses can enter into agreements confidently, knowing that their rights and obligations are safeguarded under the Indian legal framework.

Some of the recent landmark case laws relevant to contract law:

Nandganj Sihori Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Badri Nath Dixit (2022):
- In this case, the Supreme Court of India clarified the doctrine of frustration of contracts. The court held that a contract could be frustrated if unforeseen circumstances arise, making it impossible to perform the contract as initially intended. This decision provided clarity on the application of the doctrine in modern commercial transactions.
M/S. ICOMM Tele Ltd. v. Punjab State Water Supply and Sewerage Board (2021):
- The Supreme Court ruled on the validity of arbitration clauses in contracts. The court emphasized the importance of parties’ autonomy in choosing arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism and held that arbitration clauses should be construed liberally to uphold party autonomy.
Amazon Seller Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Future Coupons Pvt. Ltd. (2020):
- This case dealt with the enforceability of agreements involving future performance. The Supreme Court clarified the law regarding anticipatory breach and held that agreements involving future performance could be enforced if they meet certain criteria, even if one party anticipates a breach.
Indus Biotech Pvt. Ltd. v. Kotak India Venture (2020):
- The Bombay High Court addressed the issue of promissory estoppel in contractual agreements. The court held that promissory estoppel could be invoked to enforce promises made during negotiations, even if the formal requirements of a contract are not met, provided certain conditions are satisfied.
Jai Prakash Associates Ltd. v. Indo Star Capital Finance Ltd. (2019):
- In this case, the Supreme Court clarified the law relating to enforcement of mortgage agreements. The court held that a mortgagee could not unilaterally sell mortgaged property without following due process, reaffirming the importance of procedural fairness in contractual dealings.

Incase, You wish to discuss, and talk on any such matter that, ‘You may need help with’. Feel free to contact us. Our team at www.legalwellbeing.in shall be happy to assist.

You may also like to read, Rule of Frustration of Contracts under Indian Contract Law .

Tags: Agreements, Agreements and Contracts in India, Basics of Contract,

No results found.